(801) Farrell,K - Shearwood,B [B06]
Ettalong Winter 2004, 03.07.2004
[notes by Keith Farrell]



1.e4 g6 2.d4 Bg7 3.Nf3 Nf6 4.Nc3 0-0 5.Bc4 e6
[ 5...Nxe4 6.Bxf7+ ( 6.Nxe4 d5 interesting - since I pulled this same trick not half an hour beforehand) ]

6.Bg5 Qe8? 7.0-0
[ 7.e5 Ng4 8.h3 Nh6 9.Ne4 Nf5 10.Nf6+ Bxf6 11.Bxf6 I doubt I would have played this lunacy anyhow !]

7...d6 8.Re1 Nfd7 9.e5 Nb6 10.Bb3 d5
do we believe in such things as good and bad bishops - with the centre seemingly set in concrete

11.a4?!
Diagram a silly idea of supporting a knight on b5

11...a6 12.a5 Nc4 13.Bxc4 dxc4 14.Qe2 Qc6
I should have known something was up when I had convinced myself that there was no protection Barry could play and then a series of completely unanticipated - though normal - moves followed

15.Ra4 b5 16.axb6 Qxb6 17.Rxc4 Nc6 18.d5 Na5
times left - W - 40 B - 41

19.Be3 Qxb2 20.Rxc7 Bb7
Diagram

21.Rb1
[ 21.Rb1 ]

21...Qa3
[ 21...Qa3 ; 21...Qa3 ]

22.Rbxb7
can you say 'rushed move(s)' ?, very VERY shallow thinking [ 22.Bc1 I found this almost instantly postgame - it may have been catastrophic had I seen it just after I let go the piece]

22...Nxb7 23.Rxb7 Qxc3
completely losing sight of the connection between Rook and Knight

24.d6
[ 24.Bd4 Qc8 25.Rb3 ]

24...Bxe5
shoddy

25.Bd2? Qa1+
times W - 24 B - 31

26.Be1 Bxd6
and now I have precisely NO central pawns !

27.Ng5
desperado tactics

27...Qe5 28.Qxe5 Bxe5 29.g3 h6 30.Nxe6??
and here I thought my Rook was on b6 - idea to clear off a cople or 3 black pawns

30...fxe6 31.Rb6 Rfe8 32.Kg2 a5 33.f4 Bg7 34.g4 a4
I'd had enough - white resigned 0-1