Clarke, Thelma (1080) - Farrell, Keith (1250) [C26]
Gosford Ladder 1984 1/Gosford (5) 1984
Keith
This was my first competition game against Thelma, which certainly put me in my place if I ever had thoughts of being the "roving chess player, snapping up good results here and there".
2. Bc4 Nf6 3. Nc3 c6 4. d4 d5?!
something like ...Bb4 would have been much more useful.
5. exd5 cxd5 6. Bb5+ Nc6 7. dxe5 Qe7 8. Nf3 Bd7
This only confirms white's lead.
9.
Missing Bg5 and after taking the Rook THEN Qxd5
11... Bh3 12. Qh5 Bf5 13. Bxc6 Qxc6?? 14. Qxf5+ Kb8 15. Ne5 Qc7 16. Nxf7 Bb4 17. Nxh8 Bxc3??
And yet another fumble, looking back I'm wondering how the heck I played on - all I can think of is that I just could not see anything at all of the position - not enough to realize how many pieces I was behind.
18. Bf4
black resigns - and about time too.
1-0
Farrell, Keith (1250) - Clarke, Thelma (1020) [C41]
Gosford Champ 1984/Gosford (5) 1984
Keith
1. e4
Thelma was a long-time Treasurer of the club, eventually made a life-member. Thelma did not seem to garner strong overall tournament results, but was always a player you had to work hard to beat - and would almost regularly come up with a good result against leading players - for example a win against Eddie Mari, long-time champion of Gosford.
1... e5
2. Nf3
d6
3. Bc4
Qe7?!
4. c3
h6
5.
White has frittered away his small plus over the last dozen moves to an even game, to a small plus for black.
25... Rxe8 26. h3 Kf7 27. Rf4 Re2 28. a3
Here is Thelma consolidating her lead.
28... Ne5?!
but it doesn't take much to hand the advantage over - better was ...Rc2 or ...Ra2
29. Kf1 Nd3? 30. Rxf6+ gxf6 31. Kxe2 Nc1+ 32. Kd2 Nb3+??
...Na2 was the only way to 'save' the Knight.
33. Kc2 Nd4+ 34. Bxd4 cxd4 35. Kd3 Ke7 36. Kxd4 b6 37. f4 f5 38. Ke5 a5 39. Kxf5 Kd6 40. g4
black resigns
1-0
Farrell, Keith (1250) - Clarke, Thelma (1050) [C00]
Central Coast District 1985/Gosford (3) 1985
Keith
1. e4
e6
2. d4
Nf6
3. Bg5
h6
4. Bxf6
Qxf6
5. e5
Qd8
6. Nf3
Be7
7. Be2
d5
8.
Qa4+ may have been more active though I would've wanted to 'provoke' ...b5 in my then-view of 'fixing' a better pawn structure in place for white.
13... b5
14. Nc3
Bb7
15. Nd2?!
a6
16. a4
handing the initiative back to white
19. f3? Qd4+ 20. Kh1 c6?! 21. Ne2
b6 would have been more secure
21... Qd3 22. Qxd3 cxd3 23. bxc6 Bxc6 24. Nc3?! Rfd8 25. Ra3 Bg5 26. Nb3 Bd2?? 27. Nxd2 g5 28. Kg1 Kg7 29. Kf2 Kg6 30. b5?!
In an effort to 'win' the d-pawn I allow black too much counterplay. There was better to be had than forcing the exchange, the pawns would have been more useful together - rather than isolating another while throwing a pawn away. A better alternative being Ke3 ...Kf5 Nc4 heading for d6
30... axb5 31. Rxa8 Rxa8 32. Ke3 Kf5 33. Kxd3 Rd8+ 34. Kc2 f6 35. g4+ Kg6 36. Na2 f5 37. Nb4 Rc8 38. Nxc6 Rxc6 39. Nb3 b4 40. Rd1 Rc8 41. Rd6 Re8 42. c6 f4 43. c7 Rc8 44. Rd7 h5 45. h3 hxg4 46. hxg4 Kh6 47. Kd3 Kg6 48. Kc4 Kh6 49. Kb5 Kg6
black resigns
1-0
Clarke, Thelma (1081) - Farrell, Keith (1315) [C55]
Gosford Champ 1985/Gosford (3) 1985
Keith
1. e4
e5
2. Nf3
Nc6
3. Bc4
Nf6
4. Nc3
Bb4
5.
Nxc6+ would have been _much_ more accurate
9... Qxc7 10. Bxf7+ Kf8 11. Bxe8 Kxe8 12. Nf3 d5 13. Nh4? Qf7 14. Be3 d4 15. Bd2 Be7 16. Nf5 Qg6 17. h3 Be6 18. Qf3 Kd7 19. c3 Rf8 20. Nxe7 Kxe7 21. Qg3 Qh7 22. a3 g6 23. c4 Nh5 24. Qh4+ Rf6 25. f3 Qg7 26. b4 Nf4 27. Bxf4 exf4 28. b5 Ne5 29. Rae1?
of course Rad1 was necessary
29... g5 30. Qh5?? Bf7 31. Qxf7+ Rxf7 32. Rd1 h5 33. Kf2 g4
black clearly wants to exchange off quickly now that he is a majior piece to the good
34. h4 g3+ 35. Ke2 Qf8 36. Ra1 Kd7 37. Rfb1 Qe7 38. a4 Qxh4 39. Rh1 Qg5 40. Rab1 Rh7 41. c5 Qe7 42. Rbc1 Kc7 43. Rc4 Nxc4 44. dxc4 Qxc5 45. Kd3 Kb6 46. Rh4 Qd6 47. Rh1 Ka5 48. Rd1 h4 49. Ke2 h3 50. gxh3 Rxh3 51. Kd3 g2 52. Rg1 Rxf3+ 53. Ke2
white resigns I got QxP as black's last move, not check but obviously wrong
0-1
Clarke, Thelma (1081) - Farrell, Keith (1250) [C50]
Ettalong Winter 1986/Ettalong (7) 1986
Keith
1. e4
In our encounters over 15 years till 1999 we only played 2 games of less than 40 moves where tactics resulted from an early slip - this is one of them.time limit 30 moves in 60 then 15 mins each
1... e5
2. Nf3
Nc6
3. Bc4
Nf6
4. Nc3
Bc5
5. d3
pushing my King's Bishop around is time-consuming and not all that productive.
the open g-file doesn't look like enough compensation to me, black looks as if it can attack quicker than white can defend, and handing black the initiative would certainly be uncomfortable in the short term - and perhaps in the long.
time : White - 7 mins; Black - 4
gearing up for the "big attack"
12. Kh1??
now things get very difficult, playing Kg2 at first and nullifying the black knight on d4 was necessary before putting activity down the g-file.
12... Qh3 13. Rg1 Nxf3 14. Rg2 Ng4 15. Qe2
Here I had put in a ? in a past comment - though this is only because of the coming storm, while according to the Fritz playing engine since 12 Kh1 white had been playing the best (the only practical) available choices, as too had black..
A last throw of the dice - though this allows a mate-in-4 (if black can see it).
16... Kxg7
time: white 28 black 11
17. Bh6+ Qxh6 18. Rg1+ Nxg1 19. Kxg1 Qh3 20. Nd5
white resigns time : White - 37 mins; Black 11.5
0-1
Farrell, Keith (1250) - Clarke, Thelma (1081) [C77]
Ettalong Winter 1986/Ettalong (8) 1986
Keith
time limit 30 moves in 60 then 15 mins each
The first time we played this position (or any Ruy in fact), we played this position in another game later in the 1986 - in the remaining 3 games (in '87; '91 & '99, so far we have played 10 times(till 2001)) Thelma has had white. The position after 3. Nf6 has been a 'happy hunting ground' for me with 12 wins; 3 draws and 2 losses, although this probably has more to do with the worth of black's third move, as well as only 2 players over 1550 have opted for it (a win & a loss), than my own "supremacy". Further on with that thought about my success or otherwise with the Ruy, as white - and the following stats are based on all standard-length games till Sept 2001. My results as White with the Ruy - all rated games 43 wins 5 draws and 33 losses, against players less than 1550 : 40 wins 3 draws and 17 losses. Although the 'big plus' mainly comes against players less than 1250, against those around my level about 50-50 and against those above 1550 then 3 wins 19 losses and a couple of draws - performance in all these groups is around 1400.
4. d3
In later Ruys I would play the more active and more logical 0-0.
4... a6
5. Ba4
Bc5
6. c3
Ng4
7. d4
exd4
8. cxd4
Bb4+
9. Bd2
Qe7
10.
time : White - 5 mins; Black - 12
11. Re1 Bxd2 12. Nbxd2 d6 13. Rc1 Bd7 14. h3?! Nf6 15. e5 dxe5 16. Bxc6 Bxc6 17. Nxe5 Qd6 18. Nxc6 bxc6 19. Nc4 Qd8
time : White - 21 mins; Black - 27
20. Na5
Ne5 would have been much sounder, I'm not sure what this knight is doing on the edge of the board - one suspects very little.
20... Re8 21. Nxc6 Rxe1+ 22. Qxe1 Qe8 23. Ne7+!? Kf8 24. Rxc7? Nd5! 25. Rb7 Nxe7 26. Qb4
! - is my original note - although it is simply the least self-harmful white could make, hoping to generatecounterplay
26... Rc8
?! Rd8 may well have been preferable, blocking white's counterplay
It may look aggressive, but removing a defender favours white more than it does black.
28. Kh2 Rc8 29. d6 Nd5 30. Qa3?
Chicken - the alternative being 30. d7+ Nxb4 31 dxe8Q+ Rxe8 32 Rxb4 Re2 33 Kg3 time : White - 25 mins; Black - 45
30... Qe5+
time : White - 25 mins; Black - 45
Qe7 was needed instead
33. Qxa6? Nf6 34. Qc6 Qe7 35. a4 Nxd7
I would have felt more comfortable with taking with the Rook first.
time : White - 34 mins; ?Black - 64
37. Qb5?? Nf3+! 38. Kg2 Ne1+?!
black still has a good edge
39. Kf1 Nc2?? 40. Rxe7 Kf8 41. Qc5 Rd1+
not that it matters ... well it might seeing as how the great advantage in this game has swung about so wildly, but this allows white a mate-in-3
black resigns, and I can't remember whether I saw the mate-in-3. Thelma certainly should have won this game, certainly retaining the edge even without white's weak 37th move.
1-0
Farrell, Keith (1250) - Clarke, Thelma (1081) [C67]
Kanwal Open 1986/Kanwal (5) 1986
Keith
time limit 40/90; 20/20 & 10 mins. tournament aka "Kanwal top-of-hill. This tournament I played Patrick Keuning who came from Newcastle and who in 2001 became a player at Gosford Club.
a sensible improvement over our last meeting
4... Nxe4
5. Re1
Nd6
6. Bxc6
bxc6?!
7. Nxe5
Be7
8. d4
Bb7?!
9. Nc3?!
!?
10... Bc8
time : White - 4 mins; Black - 19
11. Bh6
!?
11... Bf6 12. Bf4 Rb8 13. b3 Rb4 14. Rad1 a5
black's position is slowly slipping bit by little bit, but it looks very hard for white to break through
time : White - 8 mins; Black - 26
16. Qg3 Nf5 17. Qd3 d6 18. Nf3 Qd7 19. Ne4 Qd8 20. Neg5 h6
time : white - 17; black - 45
21. Ne4 Rb8 22. h3 Be6 23. c4 d5? 24. Nxf6+ Qxf6 25. c5?!
I probably did not rate snatching the c-pawn that highly - being doubled and all, preferring to block the position, although I could have achieved both with 25. Bxc7 Ra8 26. Be5 Qg6 27. c5
draw offer by white before move
26... Qxh4
? the bishop was more dangerous
27. Bxc7 Ra8 28. Re3 Qe7? 29. Bd6 Qd8 30. Bxf8 Qxf8
time : White - 32 mins; Black - 68
not seeing the pin of the NP after 44.P-B3
33. Qxh6 g6 34. Qf4 Re8?! 35. Qxf6 Qg7? 36. Qxg7+
Taken the simple way out, I must have been confident I wasn't going to blunder OR I thought I would get the Queens off to reduce the effect of any blunder on my part. An alternative was to take the c-pawn and then push the b-pawn.
36... Kxg7 37. Re3 Re4 38. Kh2 g5 39. Kg3 Be6 40. Rdd3 g4
time : White - 40 mins; Black - 77
41. Rxe4 dxe4 42. Re3 Bf5 43. hxg4 Bg6 44. f3
black resigns
1-0
Clarke, Thelma (1078) - Farrell, Keith (1200) [D11]
Aust Champ 1987/Gosford (6) 1987
Keith
Australian Championship (Reserves)
1. d4
d5
2. c4
c6
3. Nf3
Nf6
4. Bf4
Nbd7
5. e3
e6
6. Nc3
b6
7. a3
c5
8. Be2
Bb7
9.
?! wasted tempo?
23... Nxg3 24. hxg3 Rad8 25. Rad1
confirms that the previous R move WAS a wasted tempo OR that Thelma wasn't afraid to switch plans midstream
25... Rxd1 26. Rxd1 Qc5+ 27. Kf1 Bc6 28. g4 Re6 29. Qd2 Be8 30. Qd5 Qa7 31. g5 h6 32. Qd2 hxg5 33. g4 f6 34. Kg2 Re7 35. Rh1 Rd7 36. Qc3 Qc5 37. b4 Qd4
draw offer by white (half joke) this whole tournament I had been using up more time, now I had used 117 mins ( 3 mins) to time control, Thelma had used 110 mins
38. Qc1 Qd2 39. Qxd2 Rxd2 40. Kf2 Ra2 41. Ra1
This is clearly a typo, I must look at the orignal scoresheet to confirm
41... Rxa3 42. Rb1 Rb3 43. Ra1 Rxb4
white was not pressing her clock - clearly had given up
44. Rxa6 c3 45. Ke1?? Rb1+! 46. Kf2 c2 47. Bd3 c1=Q 48. Bxb1 Qxb1
white resigns
0-1
Clarke, Thelma (1099) - Farrell, Keith (1250) [D31]
Central Coast District 1991/Gosford (2) 1991
Keith
1. d4
d5
2. c4
c6
3. Nc3
Nf6
4. e3
e6
5. Be2
Be7
6. Nf3
Nbd7
7. b3
missing the Nxd4 line
32... Be6 33. Rg2 Bxc4 34. h5 Kh6 35. Bc1 gxh5 36. Rh2 Kg6 37. f5+ Kxf5 38. Rxh5+ Kg6 39. g4 Nf6 40. Rg5+ Kf7 41. Ne1 Bg3 42. Ng2 d3 43. Bd2 Rd5 44. bxc5 bxc5 45. Rxd5 Bxd5 46. g5 Nh5 47. f4 Bxg2 48. Kxg2 Bxf4
white resigns
0-1
Clarke, Thelma (1079) - Farrell, Keith (1307) [D02]
Gosford Winter 1999/Gosford (1) 1999
Keith
1. d4 d5 2. Nf3 Nf6 3. Bf4 e6 4. e3 Bd6
?!
5. Be2
?
!?
7... Qxf4
8. c4
c6
9. Nc3
?
26... Nxd4 27. Nh6+ Kg7 28. Qg4 Qxg4 29. Nxg4 Nb5 30. Rc1 Nbd6 31. Ne3 Nxb2 32. Rxc8 Rxc8 33. h4
I took this as 'fiddling while Rome burns, I grew to regret letting the pawn slip through as far as it would do.
?
34... Rxa3 35. Ng3 Nbc4 36. Ng4 a5 37. h5 a4 38. h6+ Kh8 39. Kh2 Rb3
ready to puxsh the pawn
white need s too many moves to mate with the other knight (on f2) - apart from every entry square being controlled.
forced since
stopping ..Ne3 followed by ..Nc2
I considered the pawn push but I guess I was just being conservative
45. Nxc4 Nxc4 46. Kg3 Na3 47. Ng4 Nc2 48. Rd1 a1=Q
white resigned
0-1
Bassett, Duncan (1350) - Farrell, Keith (1250) [C55]
Gosford Ladder 1984 1/Gosford (2) 1984
1. e4
Duncan later withdrew from the tournament
1... e5
2. Nf3
Nc6
3. Bc4
Nf6
4. Nc3
Bb4
5. Nd5
Nxd5
6. Bxd5
black resigns
1-0
Bassett, Duncan (1400) - Farrell, Keith (1250) [C54]
Gosford Champ 1984/Gosford 1984
Duncan convened the first meeting of the Central Coast Leagues Chess Club
2. Nf3
Nc6
3. Bc4
Bc5
4. c3
Nf6
5. d4
exd4
6. Ng5
d5
7. exd5
Nxd5
8. Qh5
Ne5
9. h3
Qe7?
10.
and here we adjourned the position - get ready folks for an absolutley TERRIBLE move - especially considering I had a whole week to consider it !!
well, yeah - of course
black resigns
1-0
Bassett, Duncan (1300) - Farrell, Keith (1250) [C24]
Gosford Swiss 1984/Gosford (2) 1984
1. e4 e5 2. Bc4 Nf6 3. d3 c6 4. Bg5 h6 5. Bh4 d5 6. Bb3 Be7 7. Nf3 Nbd7 8. Bxf6 Bxf6
so - black attained equality, that's the first step they say, but his light-sqaured Bishop is a little constricted
Converting the pawn centre to something less dynamic as well as handing white's Bishop more freedom is perhaps not such a wise policy, but in the eighties I had too much a liking for the seemingly cramoing of my opponent and too much reverence for a central pawn mass - hey, those are still myweaknesses in the 21st century.
11.
thinking, justifiably, that my lead was large enough to swap down and cruise through
32. Kxb3 Nxd3 33. Ra1 Rc3+ 34. Ka4 Nc5+ 35. Kb5 Nb3?!
a check is a check - this gets nowhere
perhaps I need another Queen
38. Rxb7 Bxh4 39. Kb4 Be1 40. Nc4 Rb3+??
just how many question marks can I give this move ?
probably still in shock
42. Nxe5 Bd2 43. Kc4 g5? 44. Kxd4 h5 45. Nf3 g4??
going to pieces now
46. Nxd2 h4?? 47. Ke4 h3 48. Kxf4 h2 49. Rb1
and that is the end of that
49... Kg7 50. Kxg4 Kf6 51. Kg3 Ke5 52. Kxh2 Kd5 53. Kg3 Ke5 54. Rb4 Kd5 55. Kf4 Kc5 56. Rc4+ Kd5 57. Kf5 Kd6 58. Ke4 Ke6 59. Rc6+ Kd7 60. Rh6 Ke7 61. Ke5 Kf7 62. Ra6 Ke7 63. Ra7+ Kd8 64. Kd6 Ke8 65. Ne4 Kf8 66. Ke6 Kg8 67. Kf6 Kh8 68. Kg6 Kg8 69. Ra8+
My goodness, I forced Duncan to show he knew the basic mate, I'm so embarrassed, I can't remember my actual thoughts at the time, I'm just pretty embarrassed.
1-0
Bassett, Duncan (1250) - Farrell, Keith (1250) [C55]
Gosford Open 1985/Gosford (4) 1985
1. e4
e5
2. Nf3
Nc6
3. Bc4
Nf6
4. Nc3
Bb4
5. a3
Ba5
6. b4
Bb6
7. d3
Ng4
8.
draw offer by black
35. Qa7 Ne6 36. Qf2 Qd3 37. Qg3+ Qxg3 38. Nxg3 Rf4 39. a4 Ng5 40. Re2 Rf7 41. a5 Rc7 42. Kb3 Ne6 43. Rd2 Rc6 44. Nf5
black resigns
1-0
Bassett, Duncan (1250) - Farrell, Keith (1250) [C55]
Coast Club Match 1986/Gosford 1986
1. e4
Ettalong-Gosford-White Knight interclub event, board 6
1... e5
2. Nf3
Nc6
3. Bc4
Nf6
4. a3
Nxe4
5. Qe2
Nf6
6. Nxe5
Nxe5
7. d4
d6
8. dxe5
dxe5
9. Qxe5+
Qe7
10. Bf4
c6
11.
black resigns
1-0
Farrell, Keith (1250) - Bassett, Duncan (1250) [C50]
Gosford Swiss Feb 1986/Gosford Swiss {Feb} (4) 1986
ref 478 opp rating unr
1. e4
e5
2. Nf3
Nc6
3. Bc4
a6
4. c3
Bc5
5. d4
exd4
6. cxd4
Ba7
7.
about here ad hopes that if I got every pawn off the board then I'd scrape out with a draw
30... Rxe6 31. hxg5 hxg5 32. Kf1 Nf7 33. Bxf4 Rg6 34. Be3 Bb8 35. f4 g4 36. c4 b5 37. cxb5 axb5 38. f5 Rg7 39. Ke2 Nd6 40. Bf4 Kf7 41. Rb1 Kf6 42. Bxd6 Bxd6 43. Rxb5 Be5 44. Ra5 Kxf5 45. a4 Ke4 46. Ra8 Rb7 47. Rd8 Bd4 48. Re8+ Kf5 49. Rf8+ Bf6 50. Kf1 Rb1+ 51. Kg2 Ra1 52. f3?? Ra2+ 53. Kg3 Ra3 54. a5 Rxf3+ 55. Kg2 Ra3 56. Ra8 g3 57. a6 Kg4 58. a7
with faint hopes for R-N8ch.. K anywhere P-R8=Q
58... Ra2+
white resigns
0-1
Bassett, Duncan (1287) - Farrell, Keith (1250) [C50]
Gosford Summer 1998/Gosford (2) 1998
opp rating 1287
1. e4
e5
2. Nf3
Nc6
3. Bc4
Bc5
4. Nc3
Nf6
5. d3
black time 10 mins
12. g3
white time 22 mins
12... Na5 13. Rxf2 Bxf2+ 14. Kxf2 Nxc4 15. Qh5 fxg3+ 16. Kxg3 Nb6 17. Bg5 Qd7 18. Rh1 Qe6
black time 15 mins
19. Nd1
white time 32 mins
19... Qg6 20. Qxg6 fxg6 21. h5 gxh5 22. Rxh5 Be6 23. Ne3 Rf7 24. Rh4
white time 41 mins
24... Raf8
black time 17 mins
25. Nf5 Bxf5 26. exf5 Rxf5 27. Rg4 Rf3+ 28. Kh4 Nd5 29. Bh6 R8f7
white resigns
0-1
Bassett, Duncan (1247) - Farrell, Keith (1302) [C50]
Gosford Winter 1999/Gosford (5) 1999
Keith Farrell
1. e4
All moves in 90 minutes
1... e5
2. Nf3
Nc6
3. Bc4
Nf6
4. Nc3
Bc5
5. d3
h6
6. a3
??
12. Ng4 Bxg4+ 13. Qxg4 Qf6 14. f3 c6 15. Rf1
?
15... Nc7 16. Ne2 b5 17. Ba2 Rad8 18. Ng3 d5 19. c3 Nde6 20. b4 Bb6 21. Nf5 Kh7
I couldn't decide between h8 or h7, I thought h7 was more active, though I soon disliked the possibility of Queen or Bishop launching itself onto the white-squared diagonal.
?
23. Kc2
? better was Bg5
23... Rfd8
?
my idea was of course to clear a file and get the Rooks into the action, I thought I was dominating the centre
?
26. c4
?
26... Nd4+
!?
27. Nxd4 Bxd4 28. Rb1 Qf2+ 29. Bd2
? Rd2 better
29... Bb6
!?
30. c5 Rxd3 31. Qf5+ Qxf5 32. exf5 Bc7 33. Bxf7 Rxa3
?
?
and White lost on time ! after Black had just made it more difficult for himself ! Black had twentyminsleft
0-1
Farrell, Keith (1254) - Bassett, Duncan (1243) [C50]
Gosford Spring 2000/Gosford (5) 2000
1. e4
e5
2. Nf3
Nc6
3. Bc4
Bc5
4.
just one of those habitual moves, keeping a Bishop from g4
5... Nf6 6. Re1 h5 7. c3 Ng4?! 8. d4 exd4 9. cxd4 Bb6 10. Ng5?! Bxd4 11. Bxf7+ Kf8
I really wanted to plonk my Queen on the f-file; yet I didn't want to allow Nf6
12. hxg4 hxg4 13. Be6?! Qf6! 14. Qc2? Bxe6 15. Nc3 Bc4
black still with a strong plus
black could *still* have kept a slight plus with ...g3
18. Qxc4 Qh5 19. Ne6+ Kf7 20. Ng5+ Kg6? 21. Ne7+!! Nxe7 22. Qf7+ Kh6 23. Ne6+
black resigns
1-0
Bassett, Duncan (1249) - Farrell, Keith (1289) [C55]
Gosford Summer 2000/Gosford (6) 2000
Keith Farrell
1. e4
e5
2. Nf3
Nc6
3. Bc4
Nf6
4. d3
h6
5. a3
Be7
6. b4
d6
7. Bb2
with the idea of hopping to h4 then g2+ then e3
with the i dea of freeing up the e-pawn (and perhaps a fork on e4? if I'm allowed)
uh oh - now I was getting *really* worried, white's Bishops looked formidable, and my King terribly placed
22... c6
forging ahead regardless, even though I could see my knight being pinned once white's e-pawn moved
23. Rdg1 d5 24. h4 Nh8 25. Nxe5 Bc8 26. exd5+ Kg8 27. dxc6 bxc6 28. c5 f3 29. Rg3 f2 30. g5 Nf7
not the best, but complex enough - Duncan thought for over 20 mins (in a 60 min game - before the move he had about 25 mins to my 15 mins left, after he had about 2 mins left
*still* not fatal - however white's flag has fallen
0-1
Bassett, Duncan (1223) - Farrell, Keith (1249) [C55]
Gosford Champ 2001/Gosford (5) 2001
1. e4
e5
2. Nf3
Nc6
3. Bc4
Nf6
4. Nc3
h6
5. a3
Bc5
6. d3
trying to trap the white knight, or at least gain from its lack of mobility
34. Rh1 Rf3?! 35. Rh7 Nf7? 36. Bb5? Kf8! 37. Ne8 c5?! 38. Nc7 Rh3 39. Rxh3 Bxh3 40. Nd5 g5 41. Ne3 Ke7 42. b4 Be6+ 43. Kb2 g4 44. d4 cxd4 45. cxd4 exd4 46. Ng2 g3 47. Bf1 Ng5 48. Bd3 Bh3 49. Nf4 g2 50. Ne2 Nf3
white resigns
0-1
Farrell, Keith (1215) - Mari, Eddie (1550) [B40]
Gosford Ladder 1984 1/Gosford (6) 1984
This is my first game against Eddie. Eddie and I ended up aith an eaven score ofer the few years we competed, he was well-and-truly champion of Gosford and I was struggling against others but somehow Eddie brought out the best in me - or I brought out the worst in him, one or the other.
2. Nf3
e6
3. c3
d5
4. e5
Ne7
5. d4
Ng6
6. Bg5
Qb6
7. Be2?
Qxb2
8. Nbd2
Qxc3
9.
Looks good at first - but allows white too much counterplay.
10. Rc1! Qa5 11. Rxc8+ Kd7 12. Qc2 h6?? 13. Rd8+?
Black's King is extremely vulnerable, and the Queen is out of play. White may well have missed it by seeing the exchange of R & B for Queen and then looking no further.
13... Qxd8 14. Bxd8 Kxd8 15. Rc1 Nc6 16. Bb5
Yes - that is what evidently happened, white saw the chance to 'get rid of black's Queen, and the commanding position and possibilities that resulted and looked no deeper into the position.
16... Rc8 17. Nxd4?! Ngxe5 18. N2f3 Ba3?? 19. Nxe5! Ke7 20. Nexc6+ bxc6 21. Nxc6+ Kd6 22. Rb1 Rc7?! 23. Qa4 Bc5
Trying to keep as many pieces on board as possible.
24. h3?
so I get paranoid sometimes about losing a won game to a simple mate
24... f6 25. Nxa7 Ra8 26. Qa6+ Ke7 27. Nc6+ Kf8 28. Qxa8+
black resigns
1-0
Mari, Eddie (1500) - Farrell, Keith (1200) [C58]
Gosford Champ 1984/Gosford (3) 1984
My second game against Eddie, I started off our encounters well - for me that is.
2. Nf3
Nc6
3. Bc4
Nf6
4. Ng5
d5
5. exd5
Na5
6. Bb5+
Bd7
7. Qe2
Bd6
8. d4
just releases the tension
9... exd4 10. Bd3 Re8 11. Qd2 b6 12. c4 Qe7 13. Nf3 Nh5 14. Qc2 g6 15. Nxd4 c5 16. Nf3 Bg4 17. Nbd2 Nf4 18. h3 Bxh3 19. gxh3 Nxh3+ 20. Kg2 Nf4+ 21. Kh1 Qd7 22. Ng1??
allows a mate-in-4
22... Qg4! 23. Be4 Qh4+ 24. Nh3 Qxh3+ 25. Kg1 Ne2+
game lasted 50 minutes
0-1
Farrell, Keith (1250) - Mari, Eddie (1500) [B01]
Central Coast District 1985/Gosford (2) 1985
1. e4
board 1
1... d5
2. exd5
Qxd5
3. Nc3
Qa5
4. Nf3
Bg4
5. Be2
Nf6
6.
trying to generate -something- to happen, or "wandering rather aimlessly"; take your pick
18... h6 19. Ne4 Nb4 20. Re3 Bg6 21. Rg3 Nxd3 22. cxd3 Rfd8 23. Nc5 Rxd4 24. Nxb7
taking on the flank and losing in the centre - not generally a recipe for success
24... Rxd3 25. Rxd3 Bxd3 26. Rd1 Be4 27. Nc5 Bd5 28. b3 Rb8 29. Na6 Rb5 30. Rd4? Ra5 31. Ra4 Rxa4 32. bxa4 Bxa2 33. Nb4?! Bd5 34. Kf1 Kf8? 35. Ke2 c5 36. Nd3 c4 37. Nf4 g5 38. Nh5 Bxg2 39. Kd2 Ke7 40. Kc3 Bd5 41. Ng3 f5 42. Ne2 h5 43. Nd4 h4 44. Kb4 g4 45. Kc5 gxh3 46. Nb5 h2 47. Nxa7 h1=Q 48. Nc8+ Kd7 49. Nb6+ Kc7 50. a5 Bb7
white resigns
0-1
Farrell, Keith (1250) - Mari, Eddie (1500) [B01]
Gosford Champ 1985/Gosford (1) 1985
1. e4
haste in the endgame - not advisable
1... d5
Well I suppose Eddie was successdul using the Centre Counter against me in the District Championship, though it wasn't convincing -then-, I wonder if he has done a bit of study and found improvements.
2. exd5 Qxd5 3. Nc3 Qa5 4. Nf3 Bg4 5. Be2 c6
and this is what Eddie chooses rather than ...Nf6 ?, basically a spot for the Queen to activateit
6.
but black castles anyway - as in their previous game
6... Nf6
7. d3
e6
8. Bd2
Qc7
9. h3
Bh5
10. Re1
Bd6
11. Ng5
Bg6
12. Bf3
I suppose I preferred to swap off the dark-squared Bishop rather than the light
18... Qxe5 19. c3 Rad8 20. Qb3 Rd7 21. Rad1 Rfd8? 22. Rxd7 Rxd7 23. Rd1 Rxd1+ 24. Qxd1 Qc7 25. Qe2 Qa5 26. b4 Qe5 27. Qd3 h6 28. Qd4 Qxd4 29. cxd4
well, at least it isn't -opposite- coloured Bishops
29... f5 30. e5 Be8 31. Kf1 Kf7 32. Ke2 Ke7 33. g4 f4 34. Kd3 g5 35. b5?! Kd7 36. a4 cxb5 37. axb5?! Kc7 38. Kc4 Kb6 39. d5 Bxb5+ 40. Kd4 Bd7 41. Be4 a5 42. Bg6 a4 43. Bd3 a3 44. Bc4 exd5 45. Bxd5 Kc7 46. e6 Be8 47. Ke5 b5 48. Kf6 Kd6 49. Bb3 b4 50. Kg7 Ke7 51. Kxh6 Ba4 52. Bxa4 a2 53. Kxg5 a1=Q 54. Bd7 Qf6+ 55. Kh5 b3 56. g5 Qf5 57. h4 b2 58. Kh6 b1=Q
white resigns
0-1
Farrell, Keith (1250) - Mari, Eddie (1530) [B00]
Central Coast District 1991/Gosford (7) 1991
Keith
Eddie would joke later (in 1992) that he was afraid of me - perhaps he was in a way, since he seemed to be looking for a defense that made him comfortable. Or perhaps I'm reading too much into it.
2. d4
b6
3. Nc3
Bb7
4. Nf3
Nc6
5. Be2
Qe7
6. Bg5
f6
7. Bf4
the f-pawn may have been too costly to get
19. Bb5 Ne4 20. Nxe4 fxe4 21. Rxe4 e5 22. Qf5+ Kb8 23. Ra4 Nf6 24. Bc6 Rc8 25. Bxb7 Kxb7 26. Qd3 Ra8 27. Qa6+ Kb8 28. Kb1 Nd7 29. Qe2 Nc5 30. Nd4! Qg5 31. Nc6+ Kb7 32. Rb4 a5 33. Rc4 Rhf8 34. Rd1 Rf5 35. Rc3 Qf4 36. Qb5 Ne4??
Allows mate-in-7. OK- so it may not be all that much of an achievement but to me "actually -seepng-" the mate in all its glory gave me a satisfaction that lasted quite a long time (weeks & months).
37. Nxa5+ Rxa5 38. Qc6+ Ka6 39. Qa8+ Kb5 40. Rb3+ Kc4 41. Qc6+ Nc5 42. Rb4+
1-0
Mari, Eddie (1450) - Farrell, Keith (1250) [D00]
Central Coast District 1992/Gosford (3) 1992